CIA drone attacks produce America's own unlawful combatants

In our current armed conflicts, there are two U.S. drone offensives. One is conducted by our armed forces, the other by the CIA. Every day, CIA agents and CIA contractors arm and pilot armed unmanned drones over combat zones in Afghanistan and Pakistan, including Pakistani tribal areas, to search out and kill Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters. In terms of international armed conflict, those CIA agents are, unlike their military counterparts but like the ... Full Story »

Posted by Joey Baker
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S.
Stats Help
# Tweets: 7 (as of 2010-03-12)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Joey Baker - Mar 12, 2010 - 7:24 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Mar 12, 2010 - 2:44 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Joey Baker
3.8
by Joey Baker - Mar. 12, 2010

Interesting, and well-reasoned take. Makes you challenge your assumptions.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Walter Cox
4.3
by Walter Cox - Mar. 12, 2010

An excellent analysis as to just how far we have strayed from international rule of law and the Framer's original Constitutional mandate (based on the idea that "the King should not be able to commit the People to war") requiring a Congressional declaration of war before any military action. The CIA operates as a rogue agency and is NOT directly answerable to the American people--an extremely dangerous situation.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Randy Morrow
4.1
by Randy Morrow - Mar. 13, 2010

An informative story about the legal status of CIA/civilian operatives taking part in combat related activities.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Alexander Rose
4.0
by Alexander Rose - Mar. 12, 2010

I am very happy to see more of these stories as I feel this will be a very important topic as we move into the future of more and more automated combat. This was a topic well explored by Singer in Wired For War which I would have thought deserved a mention in this story.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 4 reviews (54% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Information
4.0
Insight
4.2
Style
4.3
Context
3.7
Expertise
3.7
Originality
5.0
Relevance
3.7
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!