Can anyone say the word, "bias"? Does anyone look at the sourcing of this and think,, "stacked"? Would anyone believe this if it was a series of interviews from supporters of the war on a comparable conservative website? Does this rate well because it confirms your viewpoint, or because it is good journalism. Journalism is the key here, not single sourcing to "prove" a viewpoint. If there were counterpointed interviews, then this would be more credible. In any conflict anyone who wants to find information that will support their side can do so. I for one will believe Truthout and the Nation when they can "print" viewpoints from sources that do not slavishly follow their meme.