Former Surgeon General Testifies

You'll notice that the surgeon generals who spoke with me came from different administrations. They all suffered the same problems. And what we wanted to do is come together with one voice and let the American public know that they should be outraged that their surgeons general of the United States have been marginalized and have been relegated to positions of relatively little importance, by political ideology, theology, and the appropriate discourse not ... Full Story »

Posted by Julian Friedland
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Julian Friedland - Jul 10, 2007 - 5:45 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Julian Friedland
4.1
by Julian Friedland - Oct. 1, 2008

Excellent, though relatively brief interview with Dr. Carmona, the last Surgeon General on how badly the White House has ignored science and the public welfare for political reasons. This according to him is nothing new, but has been particularly onerous and ideological under George W. Bush. Includes both streaming video and transcript. The NYT has a front page piece about his congressional testimony, but this interview is much better. Carmona was in the Army Special Forces, earned two purple hearts in the Vietnam War, was a trauma surgeon and a leader of the Pima County, Ariz., SWAT team.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.2
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This opinion piece allows a former member of the administration to vent, without examining the validity of his complaints, or whether he even knows about the subject in question. For example, on the stem cell issue that occupies much of the interview, he clearly knows nothing on the subject. Embryonic stem cell research has produced no significant scientific advances, only what is universally considered the biggest scientific fraud of the last 15 years. Non-embryonic stem cells continue to show advances in the clinic as well as in basic science. The administration's position allowing a limited range of Federal funding for embryonic stem cell research has been proven absolutely correct; it is not an area that deserves large ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.3
Sourcing
2.7
Style
4.5
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
2.5
Context
3.0
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!