Fractured Franchise

The average voter is not held in much esteem by economists and political scientists, and Caplan rehearses some of the reasons for this. The argument of his book, though, is that economists and political scientists have misunderstood the problem. They think that most voters are ignorant about political issues; Caplan thinks that most voters are wrong about the issues, which is a different matter, and that their wrong ideas lead to policies that make society ... Full Story »

Posted by Julian Friedland
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Topics: Election Reform
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Julian Friedland - Jul 5, 2007 - 10:12 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Mike LaBonte
3.3
by Mike LaBonte - Oct. 1, 2008

I haven't read the book, but this review seems very thorough and fair. Good context added, although there should be more evidence along with it. Evidence from the book itself is sufficient.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Julian Friedland
3.6
by Julian Friedland - Oct. 1, 2008

A sobering look at the weaknesses of democracy, though rather flawed as it suggests economistic values must prevail (an assumption the reviewer barely chides) and also neglecting to acknowledge the possibility that democracy does work rather well in other countries where people are better educated and more civic-minded.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Carol Jacobs-Carre
4.0
by Carol Jacobs-Carre - Oct. 1, 2008

The story is a good review of the book, but not an "article" in the sense that it does not examine Bryan Caplan's premises--forinstance, that every economist knows "he average person actually benefits from market competition, which provides the best product at the lowest price; from free trade with other countries, which (for American consumers) usually lowers the cost of labor and thus the price of goods; and from technological change, which redistributes labor from less productive to more productive enterprises." Economists may know this, but economists are talking about average persons as consumers only, not as producers/laborers. Hence the information of the economists is faulty. The average person's assessment of economic ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.2
Information
3.5
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.3
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
2.7
Context
3.5
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.4
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
1.8
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!