Michael Gordon trains his stenographer weapons on Iran

The Bush administration's most reliable pro-surge "reporter," Michael Gordon of The New York Times, this morning filed an article -- headlined: "U.S. Ties Iranians to Iraq Attack That Killed G.I.'s" -- that might be the most war-fueling article yet with regard to Iran. Gordon's article is 23 paragraphs long, and makes some of the most inflammatory accusations against Iran imaginable. This is the first paragraph: Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Kenneth L Salzman, PhD
4.2
by Kenneth L Salzman, PhD - Oct. 1, 2008

Glenn's critique of Michael Gordon is clear and, if the subsequent alterations by the NYT are any indication, accurate. One would have thought that drumming up a war wouldn't work so many times in a row...

See All Reviews »

Kenneth's Rating

Overall
4.2

Good
from 13 answers
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »