Michael Gordon trains his stenographer weapons on Iran

The Bush administration's most reliable pro-surge "reporter," Michael Gordon of The New York Times, this morning filed an article -- headlined: "U.S. Ties Iranians to Iraq Attack That Killed G.I.'s" -- that might be the most war-fueling article yet with regard to Iran. Gordon's article is 23 paragraphs long, and makes some of the most inflammatory accusations against Iran imaginable. This is the first paragraph: Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Dale Penn
4.2
by Dale Penn - Oct. 1, 2008

If you read through the entirety of this blog post you will notice something extraordinary. The NYT changed the story! We need more Glenn Greenwald's holding the media's feet to the fire. Bravo! Excellent journalism.

See All Reviews »

Dale's Rating

Overall
4.2

Good
from 12 answers
Quality
4.3
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »