Costs Skyrocket As DHS Runs Up No-Bid Contracts

$2 Million Security Project Balloons to $124 Million

The project started in 2003 with a $2 million contract to help the new Department of Homeland Security quickly get an intelligence operation up and running.
Over the next year, the cost of the no-bid arrangement with consultant Booz Allen Hamilton soared by millions of dollars per month, as the firm provided analysts, administrators and other contract employees to the department's Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection offices. Full Story »

Posted by Melva Hackney
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Melva Hackney - Jun 28, 2007 - 4:55 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Jun 28, 2007 - 8:43 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
4.1
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008

An important report on no bid contracts in the DHS. The story does a good job of explaining how the pay-outs to Booze Allen ballooned.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Joel Kulenkamp
4.7
by Joel Kulenkamp - Oct. 1, 2008

Well-chronicled horror story: is Booz Allen the new Halliburton?

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Rebecca Hale
3.9
by Rebecca Hale - Oct. 1, 2008

The myth of "the cream rises to the top" in the business world exposed, revealing the true cult of Bully Knows Best. Working taxpayers struggling every month to pay bills while at Private Secret Government Corporation nepotism reigns and rewards delivered are not necessarily connected to performance or accountability. Where has all the money gone.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
John Primm
4.3
by John Primm - Oct. 1, 2008

A well written story and a caution about contracting out government functions...however! O'Harrow barely touches the antiquated procurment rules, govt employees who have no incentive to monitor contractors and demand payment, and the fact that Congress mandated yet another program/agency merger/fill in the blank...with no thought for how it would be implemented or paid for or who would be responsible. Those facts would add too much for deadline, but they are the real meat! Perhaps O'Harrow will have a part 2 in this story...I for one hope so.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Melva Hackney
5.0
by Melva Hackney - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.3
Fairness
4.2
Information
4.5
Sourcing
4.3
Style
3.3
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.3
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
4.4
Credibility
4.3
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
2.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!