US Congress moves to attack foreign oil firms linked to Iran

US legislation designed to punish foreign energy companies that do business with Iran was overwhelmingly adopted by a powerful committee of Congress Tuesday.

The foreign affairs panel of the House of Representatives passed the proposed law by 37 votes to one, with Democrats and Republicans alike accusing Iran of using energy investment to fund its nuclear drive and "terrorism." Full Story »

Posted by Mike LaBonte
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Mike LaBonte - Jun 26, 2007 - 1:53 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Pamela de Maigret
2.9
by Pamela de Maigret - Oct. 1, 2008

So now the government is going to tell non-U.S. oil companies that they can't do business in Iran even with an Administration waver. "Foreign investment in Iran equals money for terrorism and attacks on Americans," according to Democrat Gary Ackerman. This is absolute nonsense and shows that the Democrats as well as the Republicans in Congress are supporting the Neo-Con agenda. Read this story and weep.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Chris Finnie
2.4
by Chris Finnie - Oct. 1, 2008

Ah! We can't let the Europeans and Japanese get all that business! I wonder if the administration has also pushed to close the loophole that allows US companies to establish offshore entities to avoid these pesky sanctions? No? I thought not. Wonder why the story didn't mention whether yesterday's rationing in Iran was connected to this? Seems a fairly substantial oversight.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Patricia L'Herrou
2.5
by Patricia L'Herrou - Oct. 1, 2008

there is too little context in this story to know what it means. '....punish foreign energy companies..' doesn't quite mean the same as 'tightening sanctions to give diplomacy...success against iran.'

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Mike LaBonte
3.5
by Mike LaBonte - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.5

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
2.4
Facts
1.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
2.3
Sourcing
3.3
Style
3.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
1.5
Context
1.7
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
2.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!