Edwards Campaign: Times Refused To Talk To Beneficiaries Of His Anti-Poverty Programs

The Edwards campaign is pushing back hard against today's enormous front-page New York Times piece alleging that there was something untoward about the fact that the antipoverty programs set up by John Edwards provided a "bridge" to his Presidential campaign. The story has already come under fire here, here, and here.

But we've just learned something new and surprising about the story. The Edwards campaign has just told us on the record that The ... Full Story »

Posted by Laura Perkins

See All Reviews »

Review

Daniel C. Walsh
4.8
by Daniel C. Walsh - Oct. 1, 2008

It is good journalism because it checked with the source of the story and rebuts the points made by the author. I think it would be clearer exactly what is being said here if I had been able to read the initial story, and be better able to speak to the "good journalism" of this story.

See All Reviews »

Daniel's Rating

Overall
4.8

Very good
from 6 answers
Quality
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
5.0
Context
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
More How our ratings work »