Rove: Sifting the Numbers for a Winner

A crucial element: the mix of Democrats and Republicans who show up this election. Full Story »

Posted by Pamela Hogle - via Wall Street Journal (Most Emailed), Wall Street Journal (Opinion)
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Member Tags: free, polls
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Pamela Hogle - Oct 31, 2012 - 10:35 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Dwight Rousu (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Pamela Hogle - Nov 1, 2012 - 12:48 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
2.9
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 1, 2012

The WSJ is not reputable any more. Rove is not reputable. The story does provide the Rove spin. It focuses on the popular vote more than the electoral vote, seemingly trying to generate enthusiasm for labeling any Democratic electoral vote win not a legitimate win. Horse race journalism like this ignores issues, trying to influence voters with momentum rather than important issue topics.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.9

not enough reviews
from 1 review (11% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Information
3.0
Insight
4.0
Style
3.0
Context
3.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
3.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
1.5
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
1.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
1.2
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!