Citizens United, Part 2? Supreme Court Overturns Montana Law Banning Corporate Spending on Elections

Democracy Now by John Bonifaz, Amy Goodman | Jun. 27, 2012 (News Analysis)

(Multimedia) "For more than a century, Montana had [barred] corporate money in elections," Bonifaz says. "Now the United States Supreme Court has said to the state of Montana that the facts don’t matter. ... [We demand] a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court and to make clear that we the people, not we the corporations, rule in America." Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, Business
Topics: Law, U.S. Supreme Court, Money and Politics, Corruption
Stats Help
# Tweets: 3 (as of 2012-06-27)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Jun 27, 2012 - 1:34 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Dwight Rousu (review), Randy Morrow (review)
Content Type: Multimedia
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Jun 27, 2012 - 1:37 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All Comments
Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Randy Morrow
4.1
 by Randy Morrow - Jun. 28, 2012

Now the United States Supreme Court has said to the state of Montana that the facts don’t matter. They’re not going to listen to the history of Montana, and they’re ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.0
 by Dwight Rousu - Jun. 27, 2012
Dwight posted this story.
See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (24% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.5
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.5
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
5.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!