Citizens United, Part 2? Supreme Court Overturns Montana Law Banning Corporate Spending on Elections

(Multimedia) "For more than a century, Montana had [barred] corporate money in elections," Bonifaz says. "Now the United States Supreme Court has said to the state of Montana that the facts don’t matter. ... [We demand] a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court and to make clear that we the people, not we the corporations, rule in America." Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu

See All Reviews »

Review

Randy Morrow
4.1
by Randy Morrow - Jun. 28, 2012

Now the United States Supreme Court has said to the state of Montana that the facts don’t matter. They’re not going to listen to the history of Montana, and they’re not going to look at the history of the past two-and-a-half years of unlimited corporate money coming into our elections in Montana and elsewhere around the nation. —- James Madison spoke of corporations as a “necessary evil” subject to proper limitations and guards. Thomas Jefferson said he hoped to “crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations.” And for more than a century, we’ve recognized that corporations have no role in our elections. So the radical action here is by these five justices, who once again refused to hear the facts, refused to look at the history, and now are telling the state of Montana that their century-old law should now be no longer enforced. —-

This move against a state making decisions by SCOTUS makes one wonder where are all the voices of protest from the states rights loving members of republicorp?

See All Reviews »

Randy's Rating

Overall
4.1

Good
from 11 answers
Quality
4.1
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »