The Only Option on Iran

New York Times by Carl Bildt, Erkki Tuomioja | Mar. 20, 2012 (Opinion)

We are deeply concerned about all the loose talk regarding a possible military attack on Iran because of the growing uncertainty over parts of its nuclear program. Not only would such an attack be a clear violation of the charter of the United Nations. It could have severely negative repercussions across the region.. Full Story »

Posted by Manfred Ostrowski - via New York Times (Opinion), Google News (Iran)

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: Nuclear Weapons, United Nations, Iran
Member Tags: international relations, defense and military forces
Stats Help
# Tweets: 0 (as of 2012-03-20)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Manfred Ostrowski - Mar 20, 2012 - 6:20 AM PDT
Reviewed by: Manfred Ostrowski (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Manfred Ostrowski - Mar 20, 2012 - 8:34 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All Comments
Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Manfred Ostrowski
4.1
 by Manfred Ostrowski - Mar. 20, 2012
Manfred posted this story.
See Full Review » (17 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

not enough reviews
from 1 review (15% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
5.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!