Journalists, You're in the Army Now

The days of the independent, neutral war correspondent, objectively reporting from a war's front lines, are quickly coming to an end. In the future, a war correspondent will either effectively be a soldier for one faction of a conflict, or he will literally not survive in the war zone. Full Story »

Posted by Benjamin Buttons
Tags Help
Subjects: Business, Media
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Benjamin Buttons - Jun 6, 2007 - 11:10 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dale Penn - Jun 6, 2007 - 12:39 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Benjamin Buttons
4.0
by Benjamin Buttons - Oct. 1, 2008

An interesting piece of analysis of the changing role and requirements of war reporting. The author, a former soldier, sees journalists necessarily "choosing sides" just in order to stay alive while reporting on a war. This is due to the fact that combatants have realized how important is information flow, and controlling it is now a big part of waging war. As the author puts it, "Whether they like or not, journalists are in the army now." Pretty chilling thought that necessarily calls into question our received notions of journalism.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Christopher Chittleborough
4.0
by Christopher Chittleborough - Oct. 1, 2008

Thoughtful analysis of how journalists will cover future wars by a former USMC infantry officer. Omits increasing importance of Special Forces, but same conclusion would hold because few journalists could keep up with them physically or mentally.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.5
Information
3.5
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Accuracy
4.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.7
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!