Professional fact-checking about as broken as professional journalism

If I were to, say, swipe your grandfather’s copy of “See, I Told You So” by Rush Limbaugh from his den, and then mail him a gift card good for a portion of the price of an Amazon Kindle, I think your grandfather would be well within his rights to call me a thief and possibly a communist. Politifact disagrees, apparently, as Democrats have been accused of telling the “lie of the year” for arguing that a vote to replace Medicare with a private ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin - via Google News (Fact Check)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 12 (as of 2011-12-21)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Dec 21, 2011 - 3:24 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Dec 21, 2011 - 12:51 PM PST
Bob Herrschaft
3.9
by Bob Herrschaft - Dec. 21, 2011

Politifact came up with a politically correct "lie of the year" which Paul Krugman and Steve Benen handily disparage in the provided links. The decision was obviously imposed from the top down on the staff with a finger to the wind in order to appease the squeaky right wheels of this no longer serviceable vehicle of communication.

Both Politifact and FactCheck have a talented staff of analysts. Without knowing them personally, we know who they are and when their advice is not being heeded due to internal political considerations. I believe a much better system was being developed here at Truthsquad with the crowdsourcing concept where dissenting opinions were published and when the verdict reflected the majority opinion.

the people at Politifact are terrified of being considered partisan if they acknowledge the clear fact that there’s a lot more lying on one side of the political divide ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.9
by Fabrice Florin - Dec. 21, 2011
See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 3 reviews (46% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Information
3.7
Insight
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
4.5
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!