Fact-check: South Carolina Debate

FactCheck by Brooks Jackson, Eugene Kiely, Lori Robertson, Robert Farley | Nov. 13, 2011 (Fact Check)

We found several exaggerations and misstatements in the latest Republican presidential candidates’ debate. Romney issued a hollow threat to take China’s currency manipulation to a world body that doesn’t actually deal with overvalued money, and he claimed federal spending consumes more of the nation’s economic output than it really does. … More >> Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin - via Google News (Fact Check), FactCheck

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Politics, Business
Topics: Global Economy, Terrorism, Afghanistan, Iran, War in Iraq, Republicans, Trade, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Michele Bachmann, Presidential Election 2012
Member Tags: the factcheck wire, Presidential debate, Republican National Committee
Stats Help
# Diggs: 22 (as of 2011-11-15)
# Tweets: 13 (as of 2011-11-13)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Nov 13, 2011 - 9:31 AM PST
Reviewed by: Fabrice Florin (review), Paulena Newhard (review), annabryant (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Nov 15, 2011 - 5:56 AM PST
Related Comments: Afghanistan (5) | Global Economy (2)

Reviews

Show All Comments
Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
4.0
 by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 15, 2011
Fabrice posted this story.
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Paulena Newhard
4.7
 by Paulena Newhard - Nov. 15, 2011

This is good journalism. It supports its claims by putting in the count of education, skill, and experiance. These are some things politians don't touch upon that are big factors in pay.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
annabryant
NO RATING
by annabryant - Nov. 20, 2011

It is a really good share.

See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 3 reviews (22% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
4.4
Recommendation
4.5
Credibility
5.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!