Couric's Twin Cities visit a well-oiled machine

It was a well-orchestrated media event that excluded the media, a private invitation-only meeting in the brand new Minneapolis public library designed to connect network news's biggest new deal -- The Katie -- with "regular folks" from Minnesota.

Those "folks" meeting Katie Couric, newly of CBS news, included former City Council President Jackie Cherryhomes, public relations guru Jon Austin, St. Thomas journalism professor Mark Neuzil, and ... Full Story »

Posted by Rod Amis
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Extra
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Rod Amis - Jul 13, 2006 - 2:14 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Rod Amis - Jul 15, 2006 - 3:29 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Warren Keith Wright
3.5
by Warren Keith Wright - Oct. 1, 2008

No, this is not an important story, though the coverage allotted by a local paper is fair enough, given the subject’s visibility. But one wonders about the wisdom of CBS’s strategy in setting up a series of eight artificial big-city occasions for Couric to cast her “Eye on America,” as if her years on NBC’s “Today” had left her clueless in this regard, and then to restrict access in a fashion which (as noted by one observer on the ground) recalls this Administration’s phony “town meetings,” where never is heard a discouraging word. With the press barred (no doubt to stop competitors from stealing fresh story ideas), these two reporters are not inclined to take the event at the promoters’ face value: the byplay over an ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Rod Amis
2.3
by Rod Amis - Oct. 1, 2008

This is a puff piece that does it's best to talk about a puff media event. Katie Couric in Minneapolis-St. Paul is NOT newssss, in the view of this reviewer. Sourced? Well, yeah, okay. Sorry to be flippant about this one.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

Average
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
2.8
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.3
Information
2.3
Sourcing
3.7
Style
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
2.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!