US Has Two-Part Strategy With Iran

Associated Press by Anne Gearan | May. 27, 2007 (News Report)

The United States is pursuing a two-track strategy with Iran that reflects the high stakes in any engagement with a nation President Bush accuses of bankrolling terrorism and secretly building a nuclear bomb.

Monday's talks in Baghdad are one element. Discussion between the U.S. and Iranian ambassadors is only supposed to cover Iraq, where they have competing and overlapping interests.

Then there are the U.S. Navy's exercises in the ... Full Story »

Posted by Mark Monday

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Politics
Topics: Iran, Bush Administration
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Mark Monday - May 27, 2007 - 12:14 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Mark Monday (review), andrew lenz (review), Fabrice Florin (review), Joel Kulenkamp (review)
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Mike LaBonte - May 28, 2007 - 8:31 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All Comments
Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Joel Kulenkamp
4.2
 by Joel Kulenkamp - Oct. 1, 2008

Overall, a reasonably well-balanced article; if only the the US would catch up with the rest of the world (particularly other industrialized nations) about more mature attitudes towards our adversaries.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Mark Monday
4.1
 by Mark Monday - Oct. 1, 2008

Good balance on a story like this is always key.

Mark posted this story.
See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.5
 by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
andrew lenz
4.3
 by andrew lenz - Oct. 1, 2008

The story that keeps popping up for this topic is on the planting of trees by eco-yuppies so they can feel good about driving SUVs. It is well written, balanced, and informative. I have no idea what the Bush team double pronging on Iran article is about because it will not appear.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.7
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.3
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
1.6
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!