Brief but noteworthy. BTW: "We are there because, after 9/11, we decided to deny terrorists any safe haven" is taken to be a lie because that was not the principle reason given for invasion after 9/11. It was WMDs, which we know now there was scant evidence for even then, as the UN inspectors told us candidly at the time. And Iraq was not a safe haven for terrorists. Certainly not Al Qaeda, which is a religious group Hussain was hostile too as he was a secularist. Saudi Arabia was much more of a haven, and most of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudis. So that's actually more like 2 lies.

A rivoting report on the Liar in Chief's address to West Point's graduates is chilling in its propagandist content. Brief, simple, Cheney speaks for himself and whatever phantoms of the night he wishes to represent.

Baloney written for morons and idiots. It's already rancid at one day old.

Does not even know the definition of a lie. Believing there were WMD was a mistake not a lie. Our enemies have gathered in Iraq ... we want to deny the terrorists a haven. How can those be presented as lies? The article is without merit.