very interesting gathering on the offences and slights to congress...by G and the D of J. reminds me of the arcane methods of turf control in DC. Also explains the continued bell ringing on gonzalas by congress and the media. clearly stated.....

This thorough treatment of the subject gives the big picture well. While there is substantial evidence, it is uneven. One anonymous source. Most opinions seem well thought out, but Dean claims that "the Justice Department has effectively admitted that the Attorney General lied" based on a guess on what a spokesman meant.

By far the best and most authoritative presentation I've seen of the case and means to terminate Gonzales.

A well reasoned argument about the ways in which Gonzales's incompetence & lack of understanding of his role even hampers the prosecution of the apparently guilty. The udneerlying story is that in the bush aministration, qualification for a government role is trumped by loyalty or worse.

An opinion piece by a "redeemed" felon. Mr. Dean brings personal experience to bear when commenting on contempt of congress and lying to congress. The story is highly slanted, draws conclusions based upon innuendo. He argues that Mr. Gonzales is not a great attorney general, but fails to demonstrate that what every Mr. Gonzales has or has not done, he can be removed from office, absent impeachment, (something congress will not due) or at the request of the President.