Human Nature

Six years into the Bush Administration, it's basically the ant wars all over again. At key agencies, a disregard for inconvenient evidence seems today to be a prerequisite. A memo prepared by the Democratic staff of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in mid-March, for example, revealed that officials of the White House Council on Environmental Quality had made more than a hundred and eighty changes to a status report on global warming, ... Full Story »

Posted by Julian Friedland

See All Reviews »

Review

Roland F. Hirsch
1.0
by Roland F. Hirsch - Oct. 1, 2008

This polemic ignores the fact that Rachel Carson is reviled today by scientists for her role in ending the use of DDT. The UN estimates that 800,000 children alone die of malaria each year, children who would be protected by use of DDT. Ecological and medical research strongly supports this conclusion. The picture presented of the Bush administration’s record on science is equally ill-informed. Knowledgeable people consider this administration to have one of the best records on science policy of any in several decades, perhaps back to the late 1940s-early 1950s. There is an outstanding science advisor, who has served longer than any previous holder of that position. The leadership in the key science agencies is outstanding and they have made major, and long-overdue, new fundamental policies for these agencies.

See All Reviews »

Roland's Rating

Overall
1.0

Bad
from 7 answers
Quality
1.0
Fairness
1.0
Information
1.0
Sourcing
1.0
Context
1.0
Popularity
1.0
Recommendation
1.0
Credibility
2.0
More How our ratings work »