The Case for Bombing Iran

But listen to what Bernard Lewis, the greatest authority of our time on the Islamic world, has to say in this context on the subject of deterrence:

MAD, mutual assured destruction, [was effective] right through the cold war. Both sides had nuclear weapons. Neither side used them, because both sides knew the other would retaliate in kind. This will not work with a religious fanatic [like Ahmadinejad]. For him, mutual assured destruction is not a ... Full Story »

Posted by Dale Penn

See All Reviews »

Review

Dale Penn
3.9
by Dale Penn - Oct. 1, 2008

Here's an article to challenge NewsTrust reviewers' ability to check their personal biases at the door. I found this to be a provocative and well crafted article. Agree with him or not, the author clearly expresses his concerns for Israel and the world with what he sees as the reincarnation of the evils of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany in the form of a nuclear Iran and Ahmadinejad. May provide the most coherent explanation of the neo-conservative thinking on Iran I've read.

See All Reviews »

Dale's Rating

Overall
3.9

Good
from 11 answers
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
5.0
Balance
2.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
More How our ratings work »