Heads I win tails you lose. This is the reasoning employed by the enemies of Mr. Paul Wolfswitz. This article highlights the contridictions between the facts as documented in the World Bank records and the conclusions of the Ad Hoc committee of the Kangaroo Court.

This article attempts to defend Wolfiwitz against the critical report from the World Bank. The biggest weakness, I found, is that the article does not ground the defense on Wolfowitz' actions being proper or acceptable. Instead of refuting the charges against Wolfowitz, the author attacked the report as being biased and cited unnamed sources and unsubstantiated claims in an attempt to prove an anti-Wolfowitz conspiracy eg. "Leaks have indicated that the Dutch government opposes the retention of Wolfowitz". Even if the report were biased, Wolfowitz's actions would not be any more or less appropriate without a proper and relevant defense - something that this article is not, unfortunately.