A Feeble Performance

Consider Mr. Gonzales's performance the other day before the House Judiciary Committee, where the chairman, John Conyers Jr., framed the questioning with admirable simplicity: who made up the list of prosecutors to be fired, and why? That should not be a hard question. The nine prosecutors who are now known to have been purged -- it was eight until the case of Todd Graves of Missouri came to light this week -- are nearly 10 percent of all United States ... Full Story »

Posted by Julian Friedland
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Julian Friedland - May 12, 2007 - 4:12 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Julian Friedland
4.4
by Julian Friedland - Oct. 1, 2008

Excellent editorial about a deeply important topic: The stacking of what are meant--by precedent and Gonzales' own admission under testimony--to be career prosecutors in the DOJ, with political ideologues. A travesty of justice by which we are all held hostage. It's incredible that Gonzales and this administration seems to be getting away with this. I guess it doesn't grip the TV ratings like Monica Lewinski. But it's immensely more important.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Ben Ross
4.8
by Ben Ross - Oct. 1, 2008

Short and directly at the crux of the disgrace of justice as delivered by the Bush white house, ....Gonzales. giving him credit where due, for the torture memo etc..... speaks of the MORAL compass lacking in this debacle.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
William Wittmeyer
1.1
by William Wittmeyer - Oct. 1, 2008

This is an editorial. It is one sided, biased, unfair, full of opinion, and well written. There is nothing to rate beyond is it a good editorial and to that extent it breaks no new ground, The NYTs has had this opinion from the first day. In this case the NYTs is preaching to the Choir.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Paul de Villers
3.9
by Paul de Villers - Oct. 1, 2008

It is good editorial writing, with some useful information but it lacks the details and the scope to be good journalism. I share the writer's point of view though.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
RT Riley
1.4
by RT Riley - Oct. 1, 2008

It's an editorial, there are no facts required. But the answer to "why? is simply "why not?" US Attys work at the pleasure of the President. He can fire any one he likes, whenever he likes, for any reason or NO reason. That's the reason Pres. Clinton was able to fire EVERY US Atty after he took office, and replace them ALL with people loyal to him. This President decided that after 6 years he would fire the bottom performing 10%. Neither he nor the Atty General have to give anyone any reason at all. But to the NYTimes, it's Sunday, so it's time to condemn another Republican for being a Republican.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
4.0
Fairness
2.8
Information
3.4
Sourcing
2.9
Style
5.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.2
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
2.8
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!