Quiet Conflict With Goldman Helped Push A.I.G. to edge

Billions of dollars were at stake when 21 executives of Goldman Sachs and the American International Group convened a conference call on Jan. 28, 2008, to try to resolve a rancorous dispute that had been escalating for months. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Tim O'Reilly, OneRiot, Slatest, Columbia Journalism Review, New York Times (Most Emailed), Publish2 (Business)
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Business
Stats Help
# Diggs: 10 (as of 2010-02-07)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Feb 6, 2010 - 1:48 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Feb 7, 2010 - 12:09 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
4.1
by Derek Hawkins - Feb. 8, 2010

Great digging by the Times. A key story as the investigation of the financial crisis continues.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fabrice Florin
4.0
by Fabrice Florin - Feb. 7, 2010

Great investigative journalism about the yearlong dispute between Goldman Sachs and A.I.G. This in-depth report reveals some of of the behind-the-scenes transactions that led up to the government's bailout of A.I.G. - and Goldman's windfall profits. Factual, well-reported article on this troubled relation and its serious impact on the U.S. economy. HIghly recommended.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Patricia L'Herrou
3.9
by Patricia L'Herrou - Feb. 9, 2010

this is a fascinating story of behind the scene of complex negotiation between two major players, leading up to the 'financial meltdown' which has affected this country and the world so profoundly. each of these two clearly were totally concerned with its own survival and not much else. one did survive and made record monies afterward, perhaps implied here, at the expense of the other's. i'd like to have read more analysis of the implications of how this all occurred.

for this reader who is limited in understanding financial negotiation,the story depicts one financial institution, goldman sachs, as the stereotypical corporate 'shark'--doing and saying whatever it takes to come out on top-- at the expense, even destruction of another. i don't know enough to know if that's a fair view or not

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.4
by Kaizar Campwala - Feb. 7, 2010

Great reporting by the Times. The story is pieced together from a variety of named and anonymous sources, outlining both the broad contours, and small but significant details. Recommended read.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Randy Morrow
4.1
by Randy Morrow - Feb. 8, 2010

Matt Taibbi has written a lot related to this topic, here is one link: http://newstrust.net/stories/45773/toolbar

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 5 reviews (87% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.2
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
4.2
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.2
Enterprise
4.2
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
2.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!