Elections Are Still Stolen the Old-Fashioned Way

What's a bigger problem with American elections: disenfranchisment of minority voters or new electronic voting machines stealing votes?

Most people on the political left will answer electronic machines. But last week, House Republicans showed America exactly why old-school election thuggery is a far more pressing problem. In fact, it was Jim Crow tactics, not computer hacking, which gave George W. Bush his Ohio victory in 2004. And such ... Full Story »

Posted by Richard Carlson
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Topics: Republicans
Member Tags: Voting Rights, Advocacy
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Richard Carlson - Jun 30, 2006 - 10:38 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Rod Amis
2.8
by Rod Amis - Oct. 1, 2008

I would adjudge this as an "Opinion" or even "Advocacy" piece rather than a traditional "News Report." While *based on* a news item, its goal is to persuade as much as inform. Thus, I can't fault it for not going for direct sources.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Dennis A. Abbott
3.9
by Dennis A. Abbott - Oct. 1, 2008

Biased reporter (liberal/Democrat). Interesting style, conveys sense of urgency. Omits sources; assumes reader is already familiar with background. Otherwise, the story does a good job of connecting the dots.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Richard Carlson
4.5
by Richard Carlson - Oct. 1, 2008

This article was posted originally on Tompaine on June 22, it then moved to Alternet and Truthout on the 30th. I chose Truthout for legibility. Comments may be found on the other two sites. This article is about Repulblican tactics used in Ohio during the 2004 election. It is a warning to Democrats and also to all Americans that free elections are in jeopardy. Also mentioned is the trouble facing the renewal of the Voting Rights Act. Very well written and documented.

See Full Review » (2 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Fairness
2.5
Information
4.5
Sourcing
1.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.3
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
2.2
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!