Is the SEC Covering Up Wall Street Crimes?

A whistle-blower claims that over the past two decades, the agency has destroyed records of thousands of investigations, whitewashing the files of some of the nation's worst financial criminals.

Imagine a world in which a man who is repeatedly investigated for a string of serious crimes, but never prosecuted, has his slate wiped clean every time the cops fail to make a case. No more Lifetime channel specials where the murderer is unveiled after Full Story »

Posted by Samuel W. Velsor IV - via Columbia Journalism Review, Memeorandum, Jaimey Perham (t)

See All Reviews »

Review

Samuel W.  Velsor IV
4.1
by Samuel W. Velsor IV - Aug. 22, 2011

Confirmation of the old skunk in the wood pile agenda, still is alive and well; which former president Bush made all the worse with one of the key rules of the Republican's, make the rich richer and do all possible to thwart enforcement of laws that might impact Big Business: Enough of my soap box. I really hope that this president gets this investigated as far back as they can, by any means; get some convictions with real jail time. To include some former agency/department heads for allowing the policy to continue on/through their watch.

Many of the destroyed files involved companies and individuals who would later play prominent roles in the economic meltdown of 2008. Two MUIs involving con artist Bernie Madoff vanished. So did a 2002 inquiry into financial fraud at Lehman Brothers, as well as a 2005 case of insider trading at the same soon-to-be-bankrupt bank. A 2009 preliminary investigation of insider trading by Goldman Sachs was deleted, along with records for at least three cases involving the infamous hedge fund SAC Capital.

Debating to read a very long report, here is one example of why to read it all; this little gem need’s a “GATE” name when you consider the damages.

Grassley learned that over the past decade, FINRA had referred 19 complaints about suspicious trades at SAC to federal regulators. Curious to see how many of those referrals had been looked into, Grassley wrote the SEC on May 24th, asking for evidence that the agency had properly investigated the cases. Two weeks later, on June 9th, Khuzami sent Grassley a surprisingly brusque answer: “We generally do not comment on the status of investigations or related referrals, and, in turn, are not providing information concerning the specific FINRA referrals you identified.” Translation: We’re not giving you the records, so blow us.

Attempt to continue the illegal activity and the cover up.

See All Reviews »

Samuel's Rating

Overall
4.1

Good
from 18 answers
Quality
4.3
Fairness
4.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
5.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
5.0
Enterprise
5.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
5.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »