Stop Coddling the Super-Rich

for those making more than $1 million — there were 236,883 such households in 2009 — I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more — there were 8,274 in 2009 — I would suggest an additional increase in rate.

My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our ... Full Story »

Posted by Priscilla L. Davis - via Dave Winer, Arianna Huffington, Umair Haque, Steve Outing, Craig Newmark, Tim O'Reilly, New York Times (Most Emailed), Columbia Journalism Review, Memeorandum, Opinion Source, New York Times (Opinion), Real Clear Politics, AllTop, Mark Pegrum (t), Salvador Sala (t), JR Russ (t), miker1717 (t), David K. Miller (t), Jon Mitchell (t), Joey Baker (t), Umbreen Bhatti (t), barbara trummpinski-roberts (t), urmi das (t), Wil Kristin (t), Megan Taylor (t), Sirajul Islam (t), Donica Mensing (t), Malorie Jae Lucich (t), Josh_Young (t), Mayel de Borniol (t), Rachel Fus (t), George Moga (t), Marc Dangeard (t), Johan Jessen (t), Ish Harshawat (t), Seth Roberts Farber (t), Ray Nichols (t), Mark Suwyn (t), Shakthi Sivanathan (t), Jeppe Kabell (t), Kaizar Campwala (t), Willie Bido (t), John Hollis (t), Jeremy Caplan (t), Ron Steffens (t), Steven K Samra (t)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Politics, Business
Member Tags: federal taxes (us), united states economy, high net worth individuals, joint select committee on deficit reduction, income tax, house of representatives, am update, income inequality, Senate, taxation
Stats Help
# Diggs: 0 (as of 2011-08-15)
# Tweets: 1 (as of 2011-08-14)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Priscilla L. Davis - Aug 14, 2011 - 8:37 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Aug 16, 2011 - 10:10 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Bob Herrschaft
3.7
by Bob Herrschaft - Aug. 17, 2011

The story reiterates Warren Buffett's previously stated position on the taxation of wealth with considerably greater detail. The significance here is the timing. Buffett is giving Obama a valuable boost to confront the issue of tax inequity at a time when Republicans are lock-step against it. Buffett had long been a conservative icon and the fact that he has largely endorsed Obama's attempt to reform the tax code is a testimony to how far the country has moved to the right.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Robin Osborne McMullen
4.2
by Robin Osborne McMullen - Sep. 21, 2011

This is an op-ed. To the extent that it is published completely and accurately, it is good journalism.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
Randy Morrow
3.9
by Randy Morrow - Oct. 13, 2011

have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Priscilla L. Davis
4.6
by Priscilla L. Davis - Aug. 16, 2011

This is stating the simple economic facts of our current tax system, that opress the poor and middle class and coddles the super-rich.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 12 reviews (39% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
3.6
Insight
3.7
Style
4.2
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.2
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.8
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.8
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!