No blank check for Bush

TIME AND AGAIN the Bush administration has tried to use its war against terrorism to justify actions that stretch or violate US and international law. Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued a stinging ``no" to one of these practices, trying Guantanamo prisoners in military commissions that lack even the basics of due process.
Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a onetime driver of Osama bin Laden, might well have conspired in terrorism, as the military has charged. But ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Member Tags: Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Supreme Court, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 1
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 2
Opinions as factsHelp: 2
Number stakeholdersHelp: 0
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 0
Derogatory wordsHelp: 0
Complimentary wordsHelp: 0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Jun 30, 2006 - 8:26 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Jul 5, 2006 - 1:45 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Richard Carlson
3.9
by Richard Carlson - Oct. 1, 2008

This is an informative editorial specifying just what the Supreme Court decision on Gitmo means to the administration. The editorial suggests Bush, rather than badgering Congress into re-writing human rights, simply court-marshal the detainees suspected of crimes.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.9
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.5
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
1.8
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!