Who’s your expert? How peer-reviewed research differs from rhetoric by climate science deniers

A jury of one’s peers should assess scientific claims. Here are two, related pieces from The Conversation, “Who’s your expert? The difference between peer review and rhetoric” and “Climate change denial and the abuse of peer review.” First, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Director of the Global Change Institute, submits some climate “sceptics” to peer-review and finds them [...] Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin - via NewsRack (Business)
Tags Help
Topics: Environment, Global Warming, Australia, Finance, Climate Change
Member Tags: financial regulation
Stats Help
# Diggs: 4 (as of 2011-07-03)
# Tweets: 17 (as of 2011-07-03)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Jul 3, 2011 - 10:04 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.7

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (22% confidence)
Quality
2.7
Information
2.0
Insight
3.0
Style
3.0
Context
2.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
3.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
2.4
Recommendation
2.5
Credibility
2.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!