Fact checking a claim on tax breaks

President Obama used oil barons and corporate jet owners to anchor his opposition to Republicans' demands on taxes in his press conference on Wednesday. His indictment against corporate jet owners in particular was repeated so often, six times, that it certainly rankled Republicans who saw it as a clear case of class warfare. Full Story »

Posted by Jon Mitchell
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 11 (as of 2011-07-01)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Jon Mitchell - Jul 1, 2011 - 9:46 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Jon Mitchell - Jul 1, 2011 - 9:48 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Lynn R. Willis
4.3
by Lynn R. Willis - Jul. 1, 2011

This concise, nicely-written piece provides clarification of some of President Obama's comments from yesterday's press conference; specifically, those pertaining to Obama's opposition to special tax breaks for owners of corporate jets. Seems the Heritage Foundation went to bat for the corporate jet owners, accusing the Obama administration of wanting to eliminate tax breaks for these folks that the Obama administration actually had included in the stimulus package of 2009. Turns out this is not true; Obama is aiming at tax breaks that have been on the books for these folks since 1987. Thanks to this article, we know now that owners of corporate jets enjoy several tax breaks, some of which have been in place literally for ... More »

Why do owners of corporate jets need special tax breaks in the first place?

See Full Review » (20 answers)
Fred Gatlin
2.8
by Fred Gatlin - Jul. 5, 2011

Any article using the Heritage Foundation is not good journalism. Politico seems so blind on their attempt to be fair that they make no real effort to be fair.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Jon Mitchell
3.5
by Jon Mitchell - Jul. 1, 2011
See Full Review » (2 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 4 reviews (68% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
3.7
Fairness
4.0
Information
5.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
3.7
Style
4.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
5.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.7
Enterprise
2.3
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
5.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!