Informative fact-check from Sci-Am about Karzai's claim. Good research, though the issue seems unresolved for now.

Highly informative and well written. Looks thoroughly at an issue with consulting experts weighing in from many perspectives. A solid example of how science informs politics. Links out to original reports that it cites and also to third-party sources that provide important context and balance.

This story covers the issue very well. It is not only U.S. politicians who are glad to use points without checking if they are right.

Excellent science journalism! The author takes Karzai's claim and assesses it based on the best possible available information from reputable sources. A stellar article!

Normally I have a lot of respect for "Scientific American," however this story seems to gloss over the known risks associated with depleted uranium, both for military personel and for civilians who must reside in areas contaminated by the fine dust that is generated on impact by depleted uranium shells. Genetic consequences for those exposed to depleted uranium are of particular concern (birth defects, inherited susceptibility to cancers, etc.), as are cancers and major organ damage that are known to occur over time due to the ingestion or inhalation of depleted uranium dust or the by-products of combustion in a war setting. These risks have been well-documented during the twenty years since Gulf War I.

Well balanced and well sourced. Presents as honest as possible analysis of the possible health risks and potential dangers of Depleted Uranium in the environment.