Someone needs to say the obvious: inventing reasons not to put the unemployed back to work is neither wise nor responsible. It is, instead, a grotesque abdication of responsibility. Full Story »
Posted by Jon Mitchell - via Paul Krugman, Dan Kennedy, Opinion Source, New York Times (Most Emailed), New York Times (Opinion), AllTop, Matthew Nadler (t), David K. Miller (t), Johan Jessen (t), Salvador Sala (t), John Hollis (t), Patrick McDermott (t), Kaizar Campwala (t)
Krugman is making an important distinction between two issues that have been confused. In challenging himself and others to focus more on mechanisms to lower unemployment, he points out that people who see no way to improve the situation are treating political barriers as if they demonstrate limits of economic policy. In other words, Krugman is advocating a discussion of potentially effective economic solutions, whether or not they appear to be politically feasible, as a necessary first step to address the problem of high unemployment of skilled and experienced workers. In particular, he points to the flawed arguments conflating the failure of political action with the unavailability of possible solutions..
