The evolutionary tree of fungi grows a new branch

Nature.com by Marian Turner | May. 11, 2011 (News Report)
Fungi found in UK pond could be part of a previously undiscovered -and extremely diverse- phylum

.....and his colleagues have called the fungi the cryptomycota, or 'hidden fungi,' because they have remained undiscovered until now, despite being present in common environments. Full Story »

Posted by Patricia L'Herrou

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: Sci/Tech
Topics: Biology, Science
Stats Help
# Diggs: 9 (as of 2011-05-13)
# Tweets: 24 (as of 2011-05-13)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Patricia L'Herrou - May 13, 2011 - 1:30 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Patricia L'Herrou (review), Stephanus Van Brandest (review), Danny Franks (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Patricia L'Herrou - May 13, 2011 - 1:35 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All Comments
Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Patricia L'Herrou
4.0
 by Patricia L'Herrou - May. 13, 2011

an interesting, even exciting story about a newly discovered branch of a form of life.

it gives new meaning to the old phrase, "there's a fungus among us" (sorry, i didn't resist)

Patricia posted this story.
See Full Review » (7 answers)
Danny Franks
4.1
 by Danny Franks - Apr. 3, 2012

The story is well-done in terms of its unusual, and surprising content. The fact that it claims to redefine a whole phylum is something surprising, as well as exciting. However, it does not influence a large population of people economically or socially. The story does highlight who the importance pertains to, mainly scientists who are interested in tracing the roots that led to animal diversity.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
| Hide 1 Comment
Stephanus Van Brandest
4.2
 by Stephanus Van Brandest - May. 31, 2011

Straight, to the point article. Good overview of the study and also efficient sourcing of experts.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story (1)Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 3 reviews (23% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.3
Fairness
4.3
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
4.5
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

Sci/Tech | Biology | Science
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!