This Story makes the argument that net neutrality is not an easy concept. In particular, disallowing a fast lane may not make the network neutral. Their argument is that infrastructure like cache can provide a significant performance advantage to some. This view is interesting, but the author failed to explain the full concept of net-neutrality and he is addressing only a small part of it as if it was the whole problem. For instance, he seems to think only of the backbone of the internet, when a lot of the problems are in the access.

Somewhat flawed argument. Author claims that would need to build massive infrastructure to compete against established market leaders. This was true long before the Internet was around. The barriers to entry into a market already served by dominant players has always been high, and probably always will be. That's a fact of business. The benefit of net neutrality is that if I have a new idea, I can start on a level playing field and grow if my idea has merit and I make better or quicker choices than the competition that will inevitably follow.

Sounds like it pays to be there first. And as always, It Takes money to make money. Google owns cyber space. Built it too for the most part.