A reasonably succinct description of the disparity of wealth especially with regard to the issue of increasing taxes on the wealthiest Americans. The position is rooted in real numbers and comparable facts. This is an appropriate chastisement to the outlets attempting to use numeric sleight of hand in order to convince the majority population that the minority should continue absorbing an ever greater share of the wealth of the nation while letting the rest of the nation sink into an economic morass.

The sociopathic class warfare bias of the WSJ is exposed by looking at the facts.

It is always good journalism to report the biases of major media. Once given the facts a reader is able to judge the credibility of the source and to wonder how far afield of truth that source has wandered and for what purpose. There is a falacy in this story. Income tax rates will never go to 100%. However there is some level of taxation between 19% and 100% that is fair and efficient in resolving deficits and the National Debt. Thanks be to Dr. Sachs for exposing the lie and pointing to the source of illumination.

Sort of. It refutes the WSJ, but doesn't address the journals main point that you either raise taxes on the middle class or drastically cut entitlements