Nuclear solution
Uranium 'bank' offers way to stall atomic disputes Full Story »
Posted by Glenn LaBauve - via BBC News
Tags
Topics:
Global Warming, United Nations, War, Russia, Iran Nuclear Program, Nuclear Power, Climate Change
Member Tags:
asia-pacific
Editorial
Posted by:
Posted by Glenn LaBauve - Jan 8, 2010 - 6:04 AM PST
Reviewed by:
Glenn LaBauve (review)
Content Type:
Article
Edit Lock:
This story can be edited
Edited by:
Glenn LaBauve - Jan 8, 2010 - 8:57 AM PST
The big 3 US, Britian,and Russia all currently have problems with their current stockpiles causing storage problems. While a new feedstock for worldwide use on its surface makes sense, there are many more concerns than simply fuel. Based on past Soviet practices, the area is probably contaminated for the next 10,000+ years already and the people in the plume area most likely are expiriencing damage currently. How much of this liability will be passed off to the UN and its members?
Glenn posted this story.
See Full Review »
(13 answers)
Retrieving Comments
NT Rating
| My Rating
Ratings
Topics
World | U.S. | Business | Sci/Tech | Global Warming | United Nations | War | Russia | Iran Nuclear Program | Nuclear Power | Climate Change
(See these related stories.)
Links
Links
UK plutonium cuts strategy 'in disarray' - scientists
It said the UK had no policy to deal with the deadly material, which was reclaimed from used nuclear fuel by reprocessing, because there are no UK reactors which can use it.
Posted by Glenn LaBauve
