The Media Likes Scaring Us, and We Like It

I'm embarrassed by my profession.

We consumer reporters should warn you about life's important risks, but instead, we mislead you about dubious risks.
I first started thinking about this when interviewing Ralph Nader years ago, before he stopped speaking to me. Nader worried about almost everything: Food? "It can spoil in your own refrigerator," Chicken? "[It's] contaminated with pesticides, herbicides, fungicides." Flying? "Inadequate ... Full Story »

Posted by Bill B May
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Bill B May - Mar 21, 2007 - 6:29 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Mar 21, 2007 - 8:09 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
3.1
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008

John Stossel makes a valid point that the media tends to favor sensational scare stories over reasonable analysis. There definitely seems to be a trend in news coverage to give people what they 'want' to hear, rather than what they 'need' to hear. That said, we depend on the media to report on issues of public concern, and expect them to continue to cover "life's important risks" - then fairly and reasonably, without the sensational exagerations - and let the public be the final judge of how to apply that information.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Bill B May
4.0
by Bill B May - Oct. 1, 2008

Stossel always tells it like it is and this is no exception. It explains a lot of what is wrong with the media and politics.

See Full Review » (2 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
3.5
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.5
Balance
2.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
2.6
Recommendation
2.8
Credibility
2.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
3.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!