The Truth, Still Inconvenient

The climate deniers can’t handle it when on of their own goes off-script. Full Story »

Posted by Fred Gatlin - via Paul Krugman, Opinion Source, New York Times (Opinion), New York Times (Most Emailed), AllTop, Google News (Science), Real Clear Politics, Tshiung Han See (t), Megan Taylor (t), Ron Steffens (t)

See All Reviews »

Review

Roland F. Hirsch
1.0
by Roland F. Hirsch - Apr. 4, 2011

This opinion piece has no journalistic merit. The author starts out with the usual smear attack on scientists as "climate deniers", which right away shows his ignorance of the actual science of climate. Calling Anthony Watts' web site Watts Up With That, a "denialist web site" demonstrates the laziness of the author of the column, who did not even bother to look at the web site, or he would know that it is entirely about scientific analysis of climate data. The author does not know that Dr Muller only presented 2% of the data that BEST is to analyze, and did not use the surfacestations database to judge the validity of the data that was analyzed. Go to the link to understand the problems with the data. Look at Figure 2 to see what the problem is. Alas, this column gets only a 6 on the Krugman hate scale, due to the author's laziness. We expect better of him!

See All Reviews »

Roland's Rating

Overall
1.0

Bad
from 11 answers
Quality
1.0
Information
1.0
Insight
1.0
Style
1.0
Context
1.0
Expertise
1.0
Originality
1.0
Relevance
1.0
Responsibility
1.0
Popularity
1.0
Recommendation
1.0
Credibility
1.0
More How our ratings work »