I find this report to be serioulsy biased and uninformed. It's opening claim that the "Western corporate media is trying to influence public opinion in favor of the Iraq War" doesn't match the evidence. Many mainstream media outlets covered the Haditha killings with competence and concern for the public interest (wasn't it Time Magazine that initially broke the story last March?). This type of yellow journalism doesn't help the public discourse in any useful way, as far as I can tell.

As a journalistic piece, it's primary weakness seems to be that the conclusion it reaches is not consistent with the evidence presented. By inferring the motivation for the BBC piece being held back and the timing of its release, a great leap is taken. In other words, stories get held back in queue in news organizations every day for reasons only than a propaganda ploy. That fact of real world editorial policy undercuts certain assumptions upon which the conclusion of the piece is derived.

Although this piece is definitely biased, it is well sourced and chronicled to make it's point. It is an excellent documentation of the propaganda promoted by the media.