Beyond Kyoto: Time to Switch Targets?

To curb climate change, suggests a new report from a top-notch global scientific team, we really ought to start focusing on rich people, not rich nations.

Rich and poor, the new study points out, live in every nation, and the rich — wherever they live — pound a much greater carbon footprint than the poor. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Member Tags: Economic Inequality
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Jul 14, 2009 - 4:06 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Jul 14, 2009 - 4:06 AM PDT
Dwight Rousu
3.8
by Dwight Rousu - Jul. 14, 2009

Pizzigati provides an interesting political perspective on climate change.

Population reduction on the planet has to be a corollary effort for climate control.

Preventing “runaway global warming,” as the Equality Trust warns, simply won’t be possible “without a sense of shared participation in a common cause.” If we did ... More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
William Hughes-Games
4.5
by William Hughes-Games - Jul. 14, 2009

A good starting point for thinking about how and where to get started in reducing climate change emissions.

We are far beyond 'fair'. Noblise oblige. The western world has a responsibility stemming from her long disproportional use of the world's resources, (including the resources of the third world), to both set an example and to work out the technology for being prosperous while reducing green house gasses. The western world has the wealth to work out these systems which will then be taken up by the rest of the world. Fair is going to push us over the edge.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Calvin Loh
4.0
by Calvin Loh - Jul. 15, 2009

The strategy sounds reasonable. And it neatly bypasses the stupid argument of "I don't need to clean up my mess because your grandfather didn't clean up his mess!" that the 3rd World countries like to use.

See Full Review » (2 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 4 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
3.7
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
3.5
Style
3.5
Context
3.5
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.5
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Thoughts: Malthus, pyramid schemes, starvation and birth control Pending

  • Thoughts: Arctic melting - no problem

    The melting of the arctic sea ice is proceeding at least 2 decades ahead of the predictions of the most extreme models. It is most likely that we will see a virtually ice free ...