Just a Bad, Bad Idea

(Blog Post) At the end of last week I couldn't help tweeting that everything I was seeing in Libya was bringing out my inner foreign policy Realist. And everything I've seen this weekend has confirmed me in that view. Indeed, there are so many reasons this strikes me as a bad idea I really hardly know where to start. So let me focus on the three biggest problems I see. Full Story »

Posted by Jon Mitchell - via Dave Winer, Memeorandum, barbara trummpinski-roberts (t), urmi das (t), Jeppe Kabell (t)

See All Reviews »

Review

Randy Morrow
3.7
by Randy Morrow - Mar. 21, 2011

It’s not clear to me how the best case scenario can be anything more than our maintaining a safe haven in Benghazi for the people who were about to be crushed because they’d participated in a failed rebellion. So Qaddafi reclaims his rule over all of Libya except this one city which has no government or apparent hope of anything better than permanent limbo. —- But the kind of modern warfare we tend to take for granted in the US these days requires getting all those different things operating together, with all the right hardware in all the right places all at the same time, keeping everything in communication over vast distances. —- It looks more like once we’ve closed down Qaddafi’s air forces we’ve basically taken custody of what is already a failed rebellion. We’ve accepted responsibility for protecting them. Once we recognize that, the logic of the situation will lead us to arming our new charges, helping them get out of the jam they’re in.

The author relates three reasons (and their implications) of why he thinks the Libyan involvement is ill advised.

See All Reviews »

Randy's Rating

Overall
3.7

Good
from 11 answers
Quality
3.7
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
3.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »