Democrats shift debate to Iraq endgame

Their argument offers the public a choice: Stay indefinitely as Bush urges or shift U.S. soldiers into a secondary role.

The new Democratic proposals for Iraq may eventually be weakened or killed, but in one stroke they have transformed a many-sided debate about the conflict into a sharp-edged argument about the endgame.

Ever since the midterm election signaled deepening public unhappiness with the war, Republicans have urged a push toward victory while Democrats have complained about the administration's course but not gathered around a single alternative. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Mar 9, 2007 - 9:35 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dale Penn
3.0
by Dale Penn - Oct. 1, 2008

Fairly mediocre analysis of this recent development from MSM. It fails to identify more than the political stakeholders and the public for consideration in the potential success or failure of this attempt by the Democratic Party leaders to shift the discussion to the endgame in Iraq. The military contractors in Iraq, the oil industry and the media are but a few of the stakeholders that go unmentioned.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
2.9
Facts
2.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
2.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!