What Will History Make of Colin Powell?

How do we remember history? Time diminishes our memories of details and spear carriers. Thirty-five years ago, as Richard Nixon prepared to resign, we readily recited the real-life cast of all the President's men: Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell, Dean, Kleindienst, Colson, Liddy, and Agnew. Today, their memory has all but vanished, except for the few still active in the public arena.
For the Vietnam War, do we remember General William Westmoreland, or ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Jul 12, 2009 - 10:36 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Leo Romero - Jul 12, 2009 - 11:37 AM PDT
Fred Gatlin
2.0
by Fred Gatlin - Jul. 14, 2009

This story should be a commentary. It is biased and lacking in civility. I am not familiar with the author but for this article to appear in a publication that includes truth in its title is a flaw.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Jul. 14, 2009

Kutler merges the hard historical facts about McNamara and Powell into a common narrative about being truth challenged in an office that by nature is under the chain of command of the president.

'Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.' The lies of McNamara and Powell are now hollow, as their lack of control of the present have struck down their gravitas. Powell is still trying to control the future by distorting the story of the past wherever he can.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Leo Romero
3.0
by Leo Romero - Jul. 12, 2009
See Full Review » (1 answer)
William Hughes-Games
5.0
by William Hughes-Games - Jul. 12, 2009

Interesting reminder of some forgotten events of our recent past.

A neat project for some computer geek would be to set up wikihistory. In it would feature all the players mentioned in this article and many many more. In it would be listed chronologically pronouncements they had made, votes they had taken (if in the government) and actions they had taken. For the politicians, it would be most amusing to compare what they are saying now with what they said in the past. Just as in Wikipedia, anyone could contribute, but a bunch of knowledgable ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
James Canning
4.1
by James Canning - Jul. 12, 2009

Kutler draws welcome attention to Colin Powell's recent effort to portray the catastrophic Iraq War in a favorable light. Robert McNamara's dishonest and disastrous contribution to the Vietnam War catastrophe is also highlighted. The article does not mention that McNamara realized by the end of 1965 there was no military solution the US could impose, to end the insurgency in South Vietnam.

Powell's astounding indcompetence helped set up the Iraq War catastrophe and he should be ridiculed or condemned for trying to sell the idiotic adventure as anything other than a disastrous lack of judgment and basic honesty. McNamara should have resigned at the beginning of 1966 and warned the American people their president was taking them into an epic calamity based on the false premise a unified Vietnam posed a threat to the US.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Dan Kooper
by Dan Kooper - Jul. 13, 2009

Probably not much - this guy was always in the background - but probably plotting his butt off.

See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Facts
4.2
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
3.3
Style
4.0
Context
3.7
Depth
3.6
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
3.7
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
4.4
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help