Plutocracy Now: What Wisconsin Is Really About

How screwing unions screws the entire middle class.

(Blog Post) In 2008, a liberal Democrat was elected president. Landslide votes gave Democrats huge congressional majorities. Eight years of war and scandal and George W. Bush had stigmatized the Republican Party almost beyond redemption. A global financial crisis had discredited the disciples of free-market fundamentalism, and Americans were ready for serious change.

Or so it seemed. But two years later, Wall Street is back to earning record profits, and ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin - via David Corn, Scott Rosenberg
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 7 (as of 2011-02-24)
# Tweets: 379 (as of 2011-02-23)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Feb 22, 2011 - 10:23 AM PST
Content Type: Blog Post
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Feb 26, 2011 - 12:49 PM PST
Fabrice Florin
4.0
by Fabrice Florin - Feb. 26, 2011

Informative perspective on the growing influence of the superrich on American politics. Political blogger Kevin Drum provides a thoughtful analysis on how this came about, and ties it to the decline of unions and middle class wages. Well researched, with thoughtful commentary. See link to a treasure trove of graphics on income inequality.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Bob Herrschaft
4.1
by Bob Herrschaft - Feb. 27, 2011

..an historical ride on the slide of the middle class and the decline of labor unions as a significant influence on the American economy and the political balance of power. The article aptly puts much of the blame on sleeping Democrats during an intense period of globalization, but only hints at their failure to put in check an economy built around a cheap credit bubble.

...although I agree that labor unions in private industry will never again be a major factor in American politics, I think that is all the more reason for progressives to draw the line in Washington's sandbox and aggressively support the public sector. Also, "New Economy" industries( i.e. Silicon Valley and high tech industries everywhere) have to be made more aware that it is in THEIR interest as well to support progressive legislation and take away their share of tax incentives ... More »

Organized labor has become a shell of its former self, and the working class doesn’t have any institutional muscle in Washington. As a result, the Democratic Party no ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Randy Morrow
4.4
by Randy Morrow - Feb. 26, 2011

Rather, the bulk of our growing inequality has been a product of skyrocketing incomes among the richest 1 percent and—even more dramatically—among the top 0.1 percent. ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.0
by Dwight Rousu - Feb. 27, 2011

A good look at the effects of the republican war on labor. Drum omits a couple major factors. One is the huge investment the corporate community has made in the news media and the resulting near monopoly by right wing "news" sources, balanced against the left failing to invest in the media. He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past controls the future. Rewrite history, and the people are lost. A second is the global metastasis of corporations, with single corporations richer than whole nations and exploiting cheap labor and lack of regulation outside the US. And he misses one lever towards as solution. With the Darwinian nature of our electoral system, only rich candidates and political ... More »

One noticable error: Obama is NOT a liberal, despite republican attestations. He is to the right of Richard Nixon.

See Full Review » (3 answers)
Roland F. Hirsch
1.0
by Roland F. Hirsch - Feb. 28, 2011

This opinion piece has minimal journalistic merit. The author is uninformed about economics, and thus continually makes errors in what he writes. For example, no economist uses static data on incomes, they always use income mobility over time (usually the 10-year change data of the IRS) for evaluating income distributions. The results are the exact opposite of what the author of this piece proclaims. Then he states that "politicians don't care much about voters with moderate incomes", which is total nonsense, since the Republicans care very much about Tea Party voters, who exactly define moderate income voters today. The author should have done some reading before writing. It really does help!

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 7 reviews (58% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
3.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.7
Insight
3.8
Style
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.8
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
5.0
Expertise
2.6
Originality
3.2
Relevance
3.8
Transparency
2.0
Responsibility
3.8
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • It's the Inequality, Stupid

    A huge share of the nation's economic growth over the past 30 years has gone to the top one-hundredth of one percent, who now make an average of $27 million per household. The ...
    Posted by Dwight Rousu