Serious doubt cast on FBI's anthrax case against Bruce Ivins

That there's so much lingering doubt about who was responsible for this indescribably consequential attack is astonishing, and it ought to be unacceptable. Full Story »

Posted by Jon Mitchell - via Salon , Umbreen Bhatti (t)
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Jon Mitchell - Feb 16, 2011 - 5:55 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Jon Mitchell - Feb 16, 2011 - 9:18 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jon Mitchell
3.9
by Jon Mitchell - Feb. 16, 2011

As always, great work from Greenwald, particularly in his sourcing. It's a little moralistic in certain places, but the facts are all there, and I think he's on good footing with his assessment of the implications.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Randy Morrow
4.1
by Randy Morrow - Feb. 16, 2011

From the start, it was obvious that the FBI’s case against Ivins was barely more persuasive than its case against Hatfill had been. The allegations were entirely ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (33% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Information
4.0
Insight
4.5
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
4.5
Originality
4.0
Relevance
3.5
Responsibility
3.5
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!