Joseph Romm: NASA's James Hansen mostly recycles myths in his mostly pointless attack on U.S. climate action

Hansen can keep pushing his carbon tax if he wants to. Heck, he can argue the merits of Betamax if he wants. But trashing Waxman-Markey based on recycled myths remains ill-conceived and unhelpful. Full Story »

Posted by Dennis Baker - via Huffington Post (Featured)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, Politics, Sci/Tech
Topics: Climate Change
Member Tags: Waxman-Markey
Stats Help
# Tweets: 1 (as of 2009-07-10)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dennis Baker - Jul 10, 2009 - 9:20 AM PDT
Reviewed by: Dennis Baker (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dennis Baker - Jul 10, 2009 - 10:20 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dennis Baker
3.0
by Dennis Baker - Jul. 10, 2009

double speak

Hansen is correct Cap & Trade redirects revenue back to emitters Carbon Tax directs revenue to different potential recipients. the best of all options is a Tax directed straight into alternative energy

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

not enough reviews
from 1 review (4% confidence)
Quality
3.0
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Style
3.0
Popularity
2.9
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!