NewsTrust Baltimore takes a local approach to media literacy and showcasing new journalism

NewsTrust sees its mission as helping readers find “good journalism” by giving people the tools to separate good from bad. But when it comes to journalism, good and bad aren’t exactly universal truths anymore. Is a story good if it adheres to facts but lacks strong writing? Is a story bad if it’s on a blog, regardless of how it’s reported? And what if its told through an ideological or political lens different from your own?

While ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin - via Nieman Journalism Lab, Howard Rheingold, Tshiung Han See (t), Ray Nichols (t), Ellie Kesselman (t), Megan Taylor (t), David Fox (t), miker1717 (t), Donica Mensing (t), Kaizar Campwala (t), Rachel Fus (t), Fabrice Florin (t), Josh_Young (t), Alfredo Ramos Jr (t), Malorie Jae Lucich (t), Matthew Nadler (t), Joey Baker (t), Johan Jessen (t)

See All Reviews »

Review

Gordon Steen
4.0
by Gordon Steen - Feb. 15, 2011

I am having difficulty with this concept. I applaud the idea behind the effort, but I fail to understand how the NewsTrust effort supports the evolution of what is becoming the "new media". I would prefer a project that addresses the needs of the community in advancing its culture. Certainly good news reporting is a part of that, but for instance how do you address the recent report that says that people spend 60 seconds a day reading the news on their smart phones? The news reporting may be great, but unless journalists start examining the ecosystem that they have to work in and start figuring out how good journalism fits into that habitat, these very valid projects could turn out to be meaningless to the news consumer in the long run. I guess this is good journalism but for me it does really get much into media literacy or new journalism (whatever that is).

See All Reviews »

Gordon's Rating

Overall
4.0

Good
from 2 answers
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
How our ratings work »