A Farewell to Harms

In television interviews she was out of her depth in a shallow pool. She was limited in her ability to explain and defend her positions, and sometimes in knowing them. She couldn't say what she read because she didn't read anything. She was utterly unconcerned by all this and seemed in fact rather proud of it: It was evidence of her authenticity. She experienced criticism as both partisan and cruel because she could see no truth in any of it. She wasn't ... Full Story »

Posted by David Fox - via David Weinberger, Alan Murray, Jay Rosen, MuckRack, Peggy Noonan, Opinion Source, Memeorandum

See All Reviews »

Review

David Fox
3.6
by David Fox - Jul. 12, 2009

See All Reviews »

David's Rating

Overall
3.6

Good
from 9 answers
Quality
3.4
Information
3.0
Style
5.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
1.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »