Egypt Shows How Easily Internet Can Be Silenced

The move by Egyptian authorities to seal off the country almost entirely from the Internet shows how easily a state can isolate its people when telecoms providers are few and compliant. In an attempt to stop the frenzied online spread of dissent against President Hosni Mubarak's 30-year rule, not only Facebook and Twitter but the entire Internet was shut down overnight, leaving some 20 million users stranded. Full Story »

Posted by Walter Cox - via Fig (t)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 153 (as of 2011-01-28)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Walter Cox - Jan 28, 2011 - 2:24 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Jon Mitchell - Jan 29, 2011 - 9:34 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Walter Cox
3.7
by Walter Cox - Jan. 28, 2011

This is an important story, because most of us rely on the Internet for information and social connection. One commentator errs, however, when he voices his opinion that nothing similar can happen in the United States-- during the late 1990's, when the Republic of Texas challenged the state government, then-Governor George W. Bush conspired with federal authorities to block access to the Republic's website; it disappeared overnight.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Ellie Kesselman
3.9
by Ellie Kesselman - Jan. 28, 2011

Informative story with historical background and understandable technical details explaining how the internet can be "shut-off" in certain parts of the world due to local infrastructure..Transparent story,with graphics and other visual aides to help with context and tech aspects of the story.

See Full Review » (16 answers)
Gordon Oliver
3.2
by Gordon Oliver - Jan. 30, 2011

This article is interesting, in that it highlights the fact that internet was shut down very easily in Egypt, but the article sorely lacks in real information about the differences between Egypt and other locations. A more enterprising reporter might have provided background on connections in better connected countries, and even some measure of how easy it would be to do the same thing in various regions of the world. In other words, provide context and depth to the story.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Colleen Brennan
3.7
by Colleen Brennan - Jan. 30, 2011

The context that is used in the story is the importance of online news and social networking, and what happens when it is taken away. It stresses the importance of Facebook and Twitter with regards to sharing online news sources and voicing one's opinion. The story is credible, although more in-depth research could have been done. The story is effective and includes impact as one of its news values, since it encourages readers to question how they would react if this happened in the U.S.. Furthermore, a photo of Egyptian demonstrators is included to increase interactivity.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Tyler Ichikawa
4.0
by Tyler Ichikawa - Feb. 1, 2011

The context that is being used in this story is that of the political struggles currently going on in Egypt and how officials there have cut off the country from their internet suppliers. The internet with such social media sites like Facebook and Twitter, were informing and fueling the ongoing struggles in Egypt. This is a credible and effective news source because it is from a trusted news source and it is a up to date and relative article.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Will Gilmore
2.7
by Will Gilmore - Jan. 31, 2011

Though this story reflects the current situation in Egypt it seems to be trivialized by the input of facebook and twitter. I feel as if social networking is the least of the country's concerns at this point. There are much more important things Internet is used for yet the article does not discuss dip into them.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 8 reviews (36% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.1
Fairness
3.7
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.3
Style
3.9
Accuracy
4.0
Context
3.3
Depth
2.9
Enterprise
2.5
Expertise
4.0
Originality
3.5
Relevance
4.3
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
3.9
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!